Ps3 Consoles – Comprehensive Assessment

Just for reference, a word about the reviewer: I am asking a 26 year old man, what I thought and what I've heard from my fellow female and male based.
What amazes me most is for the PS3 input, how often I over the price (ie, what is expensive talk). So let me frame this review in light of this:
1 - The Competition: The PS3 console's main competitor is the Xbox 360 Another competitor is the Wii. At the time of this review is the cheapest Xbox 360 Bundle $ 199. This is a 360 with no games and no hard disk. The most expensive package is $ 399 with a 120 GB hard drive, and two good games (see comments).
The Wii, $, if its not too short, costs 249th It has a hard drive and comes with a sports game.
2 - PS3: Now assuming we are going to pay 200 or $ 250 for the competition, not more (although this is certainly need for equipment, etc.), the PS3 sales Consolesas considered a competitor for 399th A notable $ 150 or $ 200 more, right? But let's consider what we get:
For the $ 399 model comes with a 80GB hard drive. The Wii has no hard drive costs $ 360 and the Xbox 100 less with 60 GB and it would be the same price with a 120GB hard drive.
The PS3-B, from December 5-2008 is the best player in the Blu-ray available. Of course Blu-ray is the new replacement for DVDs. Some time ago it had a competitor, HD-DVD has been argued that the 360 (via an add-on), but since the production of HD-DVD is stopped. So for all practical purposes, Blu-ray is the new DVD. Now that the PS3 is not only a Blu-ray (which even now, the cheapest, and I mean cheapest player is around $ 200), but the best Blu-ray, and as neither the Wii or the 360 DVD Player, but nothing (is not in fact the Wii, at least not legally), we can clearly see that PS3 is the equivalent of buying a console (say $ 200 to say 250) and a Blu-ray ( We, for $ 200). Overall, it costs $ 400-450, the same / the cost is higher than PS3. Please note that we compare just the PS3 at a lower price (and therefore bad) Blu-ray player with a hard drive less consoles. The PS3 at $ 400 is the best Blu-ray player with 80 GB.
C. Consider the following hardware. The Wii is clearly different, as it was strongly attenuated. affected Regarding the 360 and PS3 are a bit old technical comparison table (www.ps3focus.com/archives/40) available, but also take into account the following link: ps3.qj.net/PS3-Cell-Road Runner-rated-king- in-Top-500-Supercomputers-list/pg/49/aid/126379-powered. Now my point is not that the PS3 hardware is better than 360, although this is a question of hardware. My point is that the PS3 hardware put into it a real work, even if the programming, it is difficult to was. The best games have now got almost close enough to the border of the PS3.
If you think the first generation PS2 or PS1 games against the last generation, we can see a huge gap Chart. PS3 the gap will be at least as great, although official statements from Sony that the PS3 console is Lifetime at least a few years longer. Sure the 360 will have its gap, but with less hardware, we should expect a smaller gap. That and the fact that the 360 has over the age of the PS3, and therefore less "gap" is still left. As it is, at least for the PS3 hardware is the better investment (and I stress the part of the investment).
The D-all the important matches. There is no doubt that the 360 has more games that the PS3. I'm not sure about the Wii. But here confirm some facts from www.gamespot.com (Please have gathered!). At the time of this writing, has 360 of 107 games rated over 8.0, the 33 Games Wii, PS3 and 74 games. But now consider this: the PS3 is two years with 74 "good" games. The 360 is three years, 107 "good" games. But if you at 360 games, you see that 51 were the "good" games released in 2008. This means that in 360 gave the first two years, 56 "good" only games. So, the question often cited that the 360 has a larger library is a very real issue, but it makes the 360 in a game console.
In fact, if Sony releases only 35 "good" games in 2009 (which is actually a realistic estimate), they are still up to 360th in the library Of course, it makes no sense to say that at the same time since the release of their 360 titles. All I was trying to decide which is the subject of "the largest library of the game" is a false problem. Actually, more realistically, the three console games more good than most of us can buy. The real question is what you seek in your game?
E-What do you search in your game? If you are buying for the exclusive use one of your child (or perhaps a family of non-player console), then surely the Wii is a great investment and economic, but much more is missing. But if you're a player from the first of this generation of consoles, then of course the Wii is a stupid way to go. After a few hours of surfing on the arm, then realized that the Wii a toy designed to expand the gaming market, not a real game console for players of age. Maybe you go to the plethora of Wii controller to buy, to make decent experience, but with the Wii graphics (and I know that the graphics are not a game, but it certainly helps!) I see no incentive to do something (do God forbid that it is a further experience of the Wii in March HDTV 480p).
This and the fact that the majority of Wii games are designed with children in mind. If you really think Zelda for Wii is a good game for adults (17 + look good), then I say nothing will convince you. Our personal feeling (my girlfriend and I and two friends) to purchase Zelda and irritating us for about 10 hours, was that the examiners really emphasize that the game had failed only for children. But both the Wii. I think it must be at least a tasteful, an original, if not more (and more).
Well, if you're a player, the elections are actually 360 and the PS3. I will not try to decide between the two console games, even though I'm biased towards Console Games LittleBigPlanet PS3 for more varied and original (eg, Uncharted, Metal Gear Solid 4 say, SingStar and Buzz-I venture to thrill). I think this is partly because I also do not assume that violence in a game to an instant, to think that someone in Microsoft to the Games at the 360th In each case, one main reason for the decision, namely the 360 and PS3 have a large overlap in titles. Let us leave it at that time.
F quality. This is the last topic I will. First, let's be clear about the status of the Wii, and please previous comments Wii. The Wii is a product instead of many high-quality titles from Nintendo, as usual. Unfortunately, the Wii in his own world, he is going to be a generation ago, instead of the Gamecube is necessary failed. It really is the best PS2 competition. For this reason, but a good quality product that is not really relevant, as a competitor in this generation. So now lets go and watch the front-end PS3 and 360 look that is unique to each, and generally keep an eye on the aspects of innovation and good taste. I think it is clear that the PS3 XMB is furnished with taste and respect to 360th I must admit that there are some features questions, especially when the PS3 soon. But to argue that Sony has lost the support of its continuous updates on the level of functionality.
Now consider the good taste and innovation: Look at the PS3 XMB, Home, Life with Playstation / Folding @ Home and LittleBigPlanet. Consider the claims of Microsoft to a "killer" to create for each. An example: the avatars 360 new products introduced to the Wii and PS3 avatars. Surely you see the similarity between the Wii and avatars 360 avatars? Of course, one can see the added edge graphics (for all Wii) proposing that the avatar 360 to be distinguished. And you must realize that this avatar is a distorted copy of the Mii. Which is completely contrary to what the 360 has submitted his car until now. Its now clear that the 360 or a PS3 killer is a killer Wii. A killer who is sure that its customers of Microsoft who cares so little originality treated.
Put more simply, Microsoft has proven in the past that money, not the quality is his goal. When you see the wonderful test of Windows Vista. See Windows XP. And look at the new Windows, regardless of its name. Apple has done much to improve their status a few years ago, but the customers are willing to change in part because Microsoft has released a lack of care and expertise with its software to the test. I would suggest that Microsoft is doing the same in the gaming industry. Anyone who follows the news of the game (and I of course not!) Know that the video game industry is one of the fastest growing industries. This means that high profits, and an invitation for the competition. Microsoft in the market in this sense, and I think that the following facts show that not consumers are interested in them, but only in its capitalist enterprise:
> 1 - They have abandoned the original Xbox, it just started to look hard. The car was marked by a software and hardware crashes, and the consumer has asked to buy the 360
> 2 - The 360 has a history of hardware and software crashes, the notorious 360 is also known for windy together a piece of equipment (for a humorous duo of events, see: http://www.ps3vault.com / how-to-kill-a-PS3 console in 1975 by http://www.gametrailers.com/player/usermovies/289684.html followed - a time less fun, but more than that http://venturebeat. com/2008 / 09 / 05/xbox-360-defects-an-inside-history-of-microsofts-video-game-console-woes /). But inconsistency is the cost-performance ratio, even if Microsoft has recalled some of its machines completely inadequate. This does not change the fact that Microsoft would rather make money is a high quality product
> 3 - The 360 has undergone massive price cuts to stay competitive. Over time, Microsoft could even the 360 fastest drop fell the original. For now, convinced the ignorant consumers through its low price.
> 4 - the aggressive competition from Microsoft: Competition to pay more for the exclusive pay more to the game worse (for example, requires manufacturers to the 360 the lead console), it is "fair competition. The competition will be higher by the production of quality products, not with the offers of money.
Thus concludes this my thesis. I certainly spoke too long, and one might wonder, what could I have a personal interest in this. Well, not much, in fact, this whole thing an accident of a strong coffee is produced, with a break from my PhD thesis. Program due to a strike, and my personal love of facts and games. I hate to see people from the marketing year, the whole time, smart, and I hate that consumers do not take the time to learn the facts. Finally, I would like ignorant decisions, even if I understand that not everyone has the time to research. But that's why I wrote this, now you have at least a detailed description of the events. I exceeded my welcome, hello!
More details ...
What other good reviews, click here!
Popularity: 60% [?]
Related Content


Subscribe to the RSS feed comments or leave a trackback