Y'now, the more I feel this clock, I do, that could prove more long-term live have been too bad for us consumers (in my case I would have to be explained).
At first it was a fairly small fee to cover the MS-hosts a great online service for gamers. Fair enough.
Now, however, was a fee for access to an enclosed, controlled MS experience to other services that charge, too.
Sony, of course, is now following suit, although it is better for me now seems as if you fore-go this stuff is actually online game (for now) freer with the Internet browser (which is fine, but a little "clumsy) Facebook, etc. remain available and free.
This is a slippery slope, but not limited to PSN for us consumers in general, and began to live on Facebook, etc., but I loved it and had to pay MS for the services that are otherwise free, and access of services office then - that if he to be alive, only set you pay for your online game, but the access via Xbox for online services and is free.
That was not good, in my opinion, for the consumer.
Taken at face value, I see this:
To be paid on a PC my ISP and then I get Facebook, etc. Free. If I for other services, including pay
on a console, do I pay my ISP to pay my provider console, and then access to free content and other fee-based services
To live in this moment, is the worst criminal with the NDP on the rise, and it seems that the player is in the same way Activision OK, paid more for MW2 and then stupid money for map packs are now companies provide Member States and Sony on a white carriage charges between us and other services.
Not a good trend and I blame all those who have supported over the years!
Note: I like the idea, access my PS3 or 360 for such services, but the idea of MS and Sony should be able to put a premium on my ISP and a payment for services is just crazy.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment